Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
Actually that is not what victim shaming is. If a man rapes a woman and he says that she dresses provocative so she obviously wanted it and I agreed with that, that would be victim shaming. If someone claims one thing and the other person claims another and you try and look at it from both sides that is not victim shaming because either party could be the victim there. I find it hilarious people actually thanked that, Some people love a victim, back in the old days of Salem you would probably be burning innocent people at the stake because they were accused of witchcraft. Mob mentality loves it's victims and it loves destroying the accused no matter what the facts end up being.
|
Ignoring the fact that no one was actually burned at the stake in Salem (although there were executions by hanging, but that would assume you actually do research before making claims, which I think most will agree you are incapable of), you did say this:
Quote:
|
If she had no intentions of making it a non profit thing why did she eventually mention his name? If these things were happening why was she totally in board with him for so long? She says he sexually raped her during a video that multiple people who were on set have stated is simply not true.
|
Maybe not following a strict definition of victim-blaming, but it;s pretty clear you've decided, in the face of a whole lot of circumstantial evidence that points toward him being a POS, you've just decided based on your how your brain works, that she must be lying.
Good thing you're not a judge.