View Single Post
Old 03-14-2022, 06:12 PM   #108
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
They had previously stated that Invermectin was not an effective treatment. Around January 2021, they changed their opinion to state more research needed to be done. They began their own investigation in June of 2021.
That was over a year ago. What do you mean they “just” reversed their opinion?

I also think framing invermectin as not being used because it was “shouted down” as bad science for political reasons is the kind of pathetic double speak that we’ve had way too much of for the last couple years. What you mean to say is that it was “shouted down” as bad science because the science behind it’s use was bad. Nobody was against it being studied, people were against those pushing it’s use without good evidence.

That’s why we do studies and research things. It’s good science.

I know I’m wasting my time, but to frame the push against the unapproved and unstudied use of invermectin as the thing that was absurd and political was too funny to leave alone. Fascinated by how your mind works.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post: