Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
Medical doctors, unless they are also involved in research, are not qualified to interpret research. That's not what they do. Someone with a PhD would be much better off interpreting research, than the average medical doctor, who is a practitioner, not a researcher.
John Campbell has a PhD in nurse education. Part of his job is to interpret research and then teach it to nurses. He would also be involved in creating scientific literature, so would have far more experience interpreting research than a medical doctor. You would not trust a practitioner with interpreting scientific data or coming up with policy. That's not what they do. Practitioners are limited to applying approved medical treatments.
|
You think doctors have no input into medical treatments and policies & nurse educators are the ones deciding the treatments and policies?
. Individual educators or doctors aren't deciding any of that, just like law professors aren't deciding the laws.
I wasn't suggesting that every doctor could do a better job, that isn't true. Many people assume he's a medical doctor. He's not interpreting studies, side effects and treatments on his own and just teaching that to nurses. If he is, he should stop because he's very bad at it.
He's been wrong numerous times when it comes to ivermectin, over counting covid deaths and vaccine safety, (multiple times for each). He either doesn't understand it or he's being intentional.
He says in the first video that he doesn't really understand the document yet still pushes out this headline to a massive audience, it's irresponsible.
It's VERY VERY clear he's letting his bias control his interpretation. Even in that video where he admits he got it wrong, he's still kind of a implying that he's not really wrong. He's wrong, and he's drifted into conspiracy land.
Your statement on doctors not being able to properly understand the document is a good one that applies to many other fields as well, like nurse educator.