Quote:
Originally Posted by AFireInside
He misunderstood the data & has already apologized and admitted he had it wrong.
Starts at 3:55 into his latest video. "It was poorly phrased" and he didn't understand what he was reading.
It's clear he didn't understand it and he continues to put his biased opinion on this by saying doctors & nurses he knows don't know what it means either. I'm sorry but his anecdotes are meaningless and irresponsible. He suggests that if he doesn't know how to report issues then doctors and nurses won't either. Problem is, he doesn't know this to be true, he's just trying to deflect, which is pathetic.
He's not a medical doctor. At the beginning of this it was fine for him to go over numbers, but he's gone way beyond his scope, making assumptions and statements that are simply incorrect.
He stated several times during that original video that the data is complicated even for him, that's obvious.
He also claimed Japan was prescribing ivermectin when they weren't because he confused an official from a private healthcare company with a government official. The guy has lost it.
|
Medical doctors, unless they are also involved in research, are not qualified to interpret research. That's not what they do. Someone with a PhD would be much better off interpreting research, than the average medical doctor, who is a practitioner, not a researcher.
John Campbell has a PhD in nurse education. Part of his job is to interpret research and then teach it to nurses. He would also be involved in creating scientific literature, so would have far more experience interpreting research than a medical doctor. You would not trust a practitioner with interpreting scientific data or coming up with policy. That's not what they do. Practitioners are limited to applying approved medical treatments.