There can definitely be problems with providing medical interventions to young people expressing a desire to transition, but laws which are designed to 'protect' these young people from making 'bad decisions' will almost certainly have the opposite effect.
Are there people today who regret transitioning? Certainly. Will there likely be more in the future? Definitely. Is there a higher risk of someone who tranistions young coming to regret the choice? I'm not sure, but it stands to reason. Should we then make it more difficult for young people to transition? Absolutely not, in fact we should do the opposite.
Laws which put any barriers in the way of people freely expressing their gender identity, such as the "Don't Say Gay" law in Florida, create stigma and prejudice against the LGBTQ+ community, support heteronormative behaviors and reinforce the cultural prejudice that being anything other than Cis is wrong. This increases the likelihood that young people will take medical steps to transition.
How?
Diagnosed medical conditions such as Gender Dysphoria are respected, culturally and legally, in a way that self-identification is simply not. This creates a pathway for young people who are experiencing some kind of identity dysphoria to pursue what looks like an acceptable avenue when other expressions of gender or sexual identity are dismissed or suppressed. What this does is it forces the choice of medical intervention onto people who otherwise might be satisfied with some other kind of non-conforming gender identity. A person who would ultimately find comfort and a sense of self by dressing or presenting in an androgynous or transgendered fashion is told that the only way this is acceptible is if they 'suffer' from the diagnosible condition of gender dysphoria. As suffering from identity issues (crushingly hard at any age) is particularly difficult for adolescents, they can easily end up being pushed towards medical options as anything feels better than what they are currently experiencing, even if it ultimately isn't what's right for them.
Unfortunately, medical options have long-lasting consequences in the way that other non-conforming gender expressions don't. Not to mention the cudgel anti-LGBTQ+ people will create out of a few examples of people regretting their choice to transition at a young age.
So what to do? Push for the acceptance of all forms of gender expression at any age. If young people feel the ability to experiment and try things they will, they absolutely will go through 'phases' where they find a degree of comfort in non-conforming expressions which change and even fully revert over time. If this individual experimentation and expression is not only allowed, but actively encouraged, what you end up with is adolescents trying things and then making decisions about what is actually right for them in the long term without being required to make medical choices.
These laws, such as the one MRCboicgy (wow, I just fully read your username for the first time, I always saw it as MRCbiology before) posted above from Idaho, while they purport to 'protect' the youth will have exactly the opposite effect by continuing the privileging of heteronormative and cisgendered people in society.
|