Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald
No, that's what mental midgets who don't do - nor understand - nuance like to say. You can't conflate positions on very different things as the same.
|
The argument is that if you trust people's memories as proof of one claim
when no other proof exists then you must accept their memories as proof of any other claim when no other proof exists.
Your counter-argument is that ghosts aren't aliens. The relevance of this statement seems dubious.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald
Try presenting an argument and got some skin in the game. Critiquing others and not having the sack to join the discussion is lame.
|
There is no proof that aliens exist. I believe it is likely, nevertheless, that they do, or did, or will, and I also believe it is extremely unlikely that any such aliens visit this planet and give rise to reports of UFOs. Due to holding this second opinion, I disagree with your opinion on the reality of alien UFOs and further find the arguments you present to justify your opinion risible.
The above is a succinct summary of the arguments I'm making. I thought the second, at least, was readily apparent in previous posts. You are welcome to challenge either or both, however note that it is tedious to winnow through long blocks of text with low information content to reply.