Quote:
Originally Posted by jammies
I said if the same standards for evidence of aliens you believe in was applied to other unsubstantiated human experiences - like ghosts - you must conclude that ghosts are also real. Despite your obfuscating attempts to avoid admitting it, you haven't made any cogent arguments that would invalidate this conclusion, so you have indirectly claimed that ghosts do exist. If you don't think the same standards of evidence should apply to ghosts as UFOs, and therefore also prove ghosts exist, why not?
Try answering in short sentences and in no more than one or two paragraphs. Also, for bonus credit, explain why stories of witches, or homeopathic medicine's efficacy, or religious miracles shouldn't be taken at face value as well - surely the same evidentiary rules you champion should apply to all phenomena?
|
Would be nice but I suspect Lanny is a salesman or a politician in real life
