Quote:
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus
After 70+ years since Roswell and thousands of so-called reports and sightings you'd think there would be at least one silver bullet but nothing to hang a hat on.
|
A lot of what you might consider a "silver bullet" might simply be Classified, for a variety of complex political reasons. You might also have to make a judgment call on your own terms of what "silver bullet" means.
I take it you want them to walk out an ET into a press conference or roll-out some in-tact saucer from a hangar.
I would submit to you that "disclosure" is the removal of the stigma to talk about and report on it inside military complex circles. And having more public transparency on the issue is an absolute win. 'Disclosure' is the act of making something known.
'Disclosure' would mean to most reasonable people that there is an ability to report on and identify things we can't explain that fly through the skies (or oceans). I think most would be relieved to know whether it was a bird, balloon, airplane, or something else.
Knowing for sure or with reasonable confidence is what the aim of disclosure is, alien narratives aside. That perception is a heavy-handed Hollywood narrative that ignores and patronizes people's experience with things they can't explain (and those experiences go back far more than just the last 70 years). While nothing can be publicly labeled as a 'silver bullet' event (as far as the public knows), it might be more nuanced than that. But where there is smoke (and there is a lot of smoke), there may very well be a fire.