View Single Post
Old 02-28-2022, 11:19 AM   #856
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
It's not a matter of one. It's the body. They all present evidence in different ways. That's what makes me laugh at skeptics. They take these ridiculous "Occam's Razor" stances and are looking for a single event or a single piece of evidence that clearly shows something is happening. It's why the climate change debate keeps rolling along and the obvious is being ignored. Or the people that are looking for the one technology that will solve the energy consumption challenge associated with climate change. The whole body of work amounts to something that is hard to dismiss. You find one event, that's probably a freak occurrence. You find two, and you maybe have a coincidence. You find three, you're no looking at a trend. You find millions of events and you have something that cannot be ignored. The collective body is what forces me to maintain an open mind on this subject.
This. Because of the body of evidence, data, and witness accounts, it's can't just be boiled down to one "silver bullet" incident that unveils all of the phenomenon at once. In fact, it is my opinion we are likely looking at several different parts of the phenomena, including UAPs, USOs, and multi-dimensional / hard to track entities outside of human-detectable electromagnetic spectrums.

"Disclosure" will be more like a trickle-down of gradual information, with cases coming to light over the next several years due to things like potential public hearings (that Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Marco Rubio are pushing for) and the inclusion of the UAP investigations in the Fiscal Year 2022 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Then you have a growing private interest in researching the topic from groups like the Harvard-based Galileo Project and UAPx.

If anything the U.S. government will likely release more interesting data in the coming 1-5 years based on identifiable patterns, of which there is already significant data (most of which still remains classified). And with investments in further research, it will lend to building a profile of UAPs to primarily discern the relevance to national security and provide appropriate threat assessments that can be communicated to the public.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ozy_Flame For This Useful Post: