Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald
Physical evidence on persons. Scars, bruising, and unexplainable substances in people's bodies. Subdermal marks on bodies, similar to finger prints, left by abductors. Changes in blood chemistry consistent with that of being in zero gravity. Electronic component failure consistent with being in or passing through a high energy field. Dermal burns and radiation exposure.
Physical evidence left behind by UAPs. Radiation signatures, burn marks, impressions, disturbances in grasses and foliage. Photographic and videographic evidence. Radar tracking data, including triangulated radar tracking data.
But I'm sure this will all be explained away or ignored. Millions of accounts. Physical evidence. Videographic, photographic, and radiographic evidence. But not enough, right? We need a body and we need it to be hung in the town square. Even then the same people would scoff at it and try to explain it away. Just like you did here.
That narrative was from someone who saw and handled the physical evidence. Just because we no longer have access to that physical evidence does not mean it does not exist or did not exist. It just means it was confiscated and no longer available for examination.
|
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, you sorta just claimed there’s a bunch of proof out there. That’s different than proving it beyond a reasonable doubt. The thing I never understand is why someone on a message board would devote so much time and energy to a cause that is surely not a direct part of your actual day to day life. Or am I being ignorant and you’re a real life ufo survivor.