Quote:
Originally Posted by agulati
By the logic of Kyiv having been under Moscow rule, and so it justifies this, should the UK go back and recolonize all their empire? British Raj controlled India, for longer than their independence. Before the British Raj, India, along with many other countries in a similar situation, didn’t necessarily exist in its current form. Does that give them the authority or justification to go back in?
|
I never said it JUSTIFIES the war. In fact I said the very opposite. It does, however, justify accepting the status quo, getting a peace deal done and moving on. It's Russian now, frankly it should have been Russian all along, the way Ukraine got it at the first place was not "democratic" and "fair" either. Some people say that recognizing Crimea is a no starter, so no peace talks until Putin drops this point. I don't get why. No point in bleeding over it, let Russia have it, get peace agreement and move on.