Quote:
Originally posted by Displaced Flames fan+Aug 9 2004, 09:33 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Displaced Flames fan @ Aug 9 2004, 09:33 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by RougeUnderoos@Aug 10 2004, 12:17 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Displaced Flames fan
|
Quote:
@Aug 9 2004, 05:38 PM
I doubt Joe Wilson, the woman in question's husband and former ambassador, wants the source to get out.# He's been making a living accusing the White House.
He's been exposed as a liar on some issues surrounding this case as it is so I would expect that it will be a bombshell.
|
You've sort of lost me with that second paragraph. Are you inferring that he himself was the leak?
Ho hum. Just another Carter/Reagan/Bush/Clinton/Bush flunky obviously making stuff up and writing a book. It seems to be a pattern. Fllluuuusshhh for this one. Criticism = lie these days, we all know that.
|
Has anyone ever told you what they say about assumptions? [/b][/quote]
Ha ha yeah -- they make an ass out of u! Says something about me too but I can't remember what that was.
Seriously though -- fair enough -- that was a weak response on my part. It just seems to me that several people from the actual Bush/Republican administrations have come out with criticisms of the war/war pre-amble and the response is either "he's lying" or "he's making money off saying that" or "he's lying and making money off lying". There has to be more to it than that. These are serious people and I don't think all of them would start lying through their teeth to make a few bucks on a book deal. I would *assume* that they are smart enough/well connected enough to get rich on merit and wouldn't sully their own reputation and long career for money.
That's kind of a conundrum I guess. It's kind of a "Damned if you do (we hired a bunch of liars for important positions!) and damned if you don't (we hired good people and they are now telling everyone what we did!)"