Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotKenKing
And then maybe they don't have Tanev, or Markstrom.
I'd say things worked out pretty, pretty good...
Also, I am having trouble following the first sentence. It's steep if the Flames don't tank? Firstly, tanking implies on purpose, which is not going to happen.
Secondly, I think you mean it's steep if the Flames do falter and the pick ends up high...
|
If I recall, Flames gave up a 1st rounder on a trade for a D-man and frickin tanked to near the bottom. Who would've expected the Flames to give away a high draft pick before the trade happened. So, that sentence made very good sense. As for Markstrom, I'm still not totally sold on why Tre needed to get him when there are cheaper options. I think implying that Markstrom is a savior on this team as compared to Kipper wouldn't be fair to what the players are doing in front of their goalie at this point in time.