Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteTiger
What is there to talk about? This is nothing new. You've always been free to make whatever choices you want. Your employer is free to keep you employed or not. It's not like this sprung up out of the ground a few weeks ago. It's been status quo for decades.
As with and in all things, you are free to make the 'choice' you want to make, but you MUST deal with the consequences of it. Being 'free' doesn't mean you get to make consequence free choices. It never has.
|
It's not the employee making the choice, if they have remained consistent in the state of their being throughout their employment. It is the employer making a choice to change the nature of their employment.
That would normally invoke certain right on behalf of the employed because they are not instigating the change. How is this not unusual? A lot of people have been set adrift, many of them in positions in which they were not a threat to anybody (remote jobs for instance).
In situations like that, it is a political stance on behalf of the employer that is causing the termination of the employee, if health and safety are not a concern. The mandates are chalk full of grey areas.
edit : sorry, this is off topic