Quote:
Originally Posted by dustygoon
You mean you think two agents picked on Calgary in an Athletic article to get leverage on Calgary for upcoming negotiations? But other agents didn't do this to other teams? I might be missing your point.
|
Other agents may have. It would be as good a reason as any...it's a nothingburger, but if they got lucky and Calgary ended up at the bottom of the list it might mean a tiny bit of something.
I suspect a few agents were simply jaded over recent negotiations, too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus
To be fair, do you really think there are that many more influential agents in the game? 20 individuals seems like it is probably getting close to a significant portion of anyone who is worth listening to on this matter.
|
We don't know if the influential agents would bother responding to this