Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger
No. Jeopardy is way too complex to rig. There are way too many questions. Plus, most contestants know pretty much all of the answers and the show is won or lost on buzzer timing.
Final wasn’t even why she lost. She lost because that guy nailed the easy ass daily double and doubled his score and then just coasted to final lucky that he was within striking distance. He doesn’t make that, or better yet she picks that clue, and her lead is once again insurmountable going into final.
|
I like how Ken pushes people to use daily doubles properly when they are trailing. "You see the scores, you are watching how Amy is playing".
And then the utter disappointment when they don't bet big.
I find that generally Jeopardy players are really poor in deciding what to bet.
For instance when someone bets ALMOST all their money, but not enough to take the lead? WTF is the rationale for that.