03-20-2007, 06:28 PM
|
#8
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bring_Back_Shantz
You guys have to read a little closer.
It says he's eligible for parole after 10 years.
I've actually been reading about this case in the papers every morning, and if I recall correctly he was given a life sentence (25 years I belive it actually is), but he was given the minimum parole eligibility, which means he'll spend a MINIMUM of 10 years (it says this somewhat ambiguously in the article) in jail, and it could be upwards of 25 (though not likely).
Not a very well written article if you ask me because it left out a few critical facts.
Either way, the guy is a nut, and deserves more than he got.
|
Ah I see your right the article is rather misleading
Mods if you wouldn’t throwing “a minimum of” in the title for clarification that would be great
|
|
|