[OptimalTates]

Originally Posted by boogerz

Neither of those incidents follow Patrick Kane around despite what an obviously toxic individual he is in his personal life. You didn't even remember those incidents until someone else reminded you because they've essentially been swept under the rug/forgotten by public consciousness. If P. Kane has verifiably assaulted two people, there must be more...right...?

Except I made mention to both incidents, both of which were much bigger stories than anything E.Kane got himself involved in, before being "reminded". You said numerous, there was one incident substantiated and another where the prosecutor had to do an interview to discuss an elaborate hoax presented by the alleged victim's mother before having to say the victim stopped working with them and her story was rife with doubt before dropping the charges.

Originally Posted by boogerz

Then, when you refer to Evander Kane in the same post, you use a bunch of rumors or alleged events...none of which have proven except for the 2013 bar fight. Lots of hockey players are involved in bar fights that go relatively unreported in the media, with two examples of that being Ferland and Phaneuf. What is so different about E. Kane's bar fight that necessitated as much media coverage as it received...?

It wasn't a bar fight. The guy was walking home from work according to his statement of claims. Not all that different from P.Kane who's cab incident was far bigger news despite his race.

And none of them have been proven? Not even the one which was substantiated by video that showed him grabbing the women by their arms and hair? He got his charges stayed for staying out of trouble for six months (the one time he seemed to have been able to).

Originally Posted by boogerz

Also, none of E. Kane's ex-wife's claims have been corroborated. In fact, the courts granted him a restraining order against her, as well as full custody of their child because she's mentally unwell. For things to be so bad that a US court grants full custody to a father like that, much less a father with as many perceived character issues as E. Kane, invalidates every accusation that she's made.

Seven people, whose only connection is being allegedly assaulted by Kane, have opened themselves up to perjury charges to say a bankrupt person assaulted them. It's almost like they are doing so because they were assaulted by him.

Rachele Kuechle has pursued justice for 7 years now, soon to get her court date despite knowing that even if the civil case goes her way she's not likely to see much of anything because his bankruptcy.

Originally Posted by boogerz

The premise of my response to Loob was that (1) E. Kane unfairly has significantly more public scrutiny on his life because he is "different" (i.e. black), and (2) the public are unjustly vilifying E. Kane for acting in the same manner as his white peers because of that enhanced media scrutiny.

Thanks for proving my point with your responses. Carry on...

Name one white person in the NHL with seven people who have filled police reports or court affidavits alleging assault that would open themselves up to perjury if they are found to have lied. I'll wait. Then add another ex-girlfriend also alleging abuse for good measure.

Having seven people claim a form of assault puts him in line with Weinstein, Epstein, Prince Andrew...Not random NHL players.