Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
This would take a lot less council time and expense if CSEC would just step forward and admit the real reason was overall cost increases, not the extra city costs.
|
Honestly, if that is the case (which is pretty obvious it is), then it is not even that bad of an argument to make. CSEC could have easily said "whoa whoa, the costs are getting crazy and maybe we take a step back and wait for supply issues to resolve and see if this thing can get back down to the original estimates." If they don't, CSEC would have a non-horrible argument to make that the city should jump.
instead, they have done this which is petulant and entirely transparent.