Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
It was agreed at 50/50 then the city said they were no longer comfortable with that and asked to not be on the hook for cost overruns.
So again, when one side doesn't want to share in cost overruns after agreeing to share 50/50 I'm assuming they had some tension about where said costs were going.
|
Wasn't this issue at the time CSEC wanting to add features for themselves the city didn't want to cover, so it was agreed CSEC would take on the extra costs of changes, should they desire them? To me it seems CSEC negotiated themselves into a situation they ended up not wanting to be in.