Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
I just don't see it as such.
The final decision was made in and around the costs that the mayor eluded to, but both sides have been nervous with the rising costs for the past 18 months.
I may make a decision to cut my losses on a 5% move on a stock price, but if I've lost 30% in the last three weeks it's not the 5% that is the killer ... it's the additional 5%.
|
Again, explain how both sides are getting nervous about rising costs when it was agreed that the Flames were the ones eating the cost increases.