View Single Post
Old 03-18-2007, 10:04 PM   #50
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eazyduzzit View Post
Exacly.

The Iraq war is precieved as right to a lot of people and wrong to a lot. Segregation was precieved as right to a lot of people and wrong to a lot. Just as slavery was at one point, accepted. Just as women where looked at as second class citizens for a good period of history. It was precieved as right then, wrong now.

South Africa may have took a little longer to abolish it's segregation than lets say the United States or other countries, but different circumstances bring about different time tables. There is no doubt in my mind, South Africa would be a free nation today even if it was not for the rout the ANC took.

Just as when it comes to women in society, for most nations in the world, women are treated eaqually now, but in some nations they are still treated second class and in some cases, little more than objects which leads me back to:

Different circumstances have different time tables. Just as the "western world/christian nations" treats women eaqually, one day Islam will too, do the same. Just as the United States abolished segregation, South Africa did follow suit...years later...but different circumstances.

Looking back at history, people took a lot of ridiculous stances on things, as citizens in the 21st century we can look back and see it as such, but going back in time, it might not be precieved as wrong as it is now. Bottom line is, all of what i've just said is wrong and i'm not defending any of these acts, all i'm saying is you have to be held acountable, no matter what the majority of the public may think. Murder is Murder. Segregation is Segregation. Punish both or punish neither.

If you have a bone to pick with segregation in the 21st century, give Israel a call.



He didn't.
That's a pretty strange argument. You acknowledge that these practices were wrong but criticize the people who fought against them.

And the idea that "it was accepted at the time" or "different circumstances" are an excuse for a downright crazy practice like apartheid don't quite cut it.

I don't buy that "murder is murder" stuff either. If someone burns down your house and kills your kids while he's at it, you might kill him, and if you do, it's a little more understandable than if you went into a gas station and shot the clerk for the cash in the till.

As far as I'm concerned, condemning Mandela for his actions is like condemning someone who resisted the Nazis.
__________________

RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote