Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
I still haven't seen a definitive summary of what the issue is, but is the following true?
The city under rising input costs asked not to be on the hook for cost over runs.
The Flames came back with fine, but then we are using our own project management.
Costs rise more and now the Flames, like the city before are getting cold feet as the city isn't raising costs on their end, just the CSEC.
The Flames then see the city push some more costs into it and decide that's the breaking point.
The mayor goes to Twitter to out line her case.
That's it right?
Can't believe we have 45 pages of polar views acting like this is one side only (from both sides).
Honestly seems childish to me.
|
Both sides don't see it feasible and were actively looking for an out on each side is my thought on this whole thing.
That's pretty obvious. There's no way CSEC didn't anticipate this move by the City