Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk
Certainly one option. When the city asked if they would consider the measure, they said they would want to do it in a way they could seek partnerships. They also needed consideration for how it would interact with rooftop sponsorship signage. That was why it was a prior to occupancy condition, not prior to approval or prior to release to buy time to figure that stuff out. It seemed a reasonable way to accommodate. As the flames started to worry about cost, the mayor offered to help seek other funding sources too.
I understand people are upset, looking for people to blame. But I think this is barking up the wrong tree.
|
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|