Can a lot of this just be chalked up to bad circumstances? The Flames ownership agreed to cost overruns when there were known overruns which were manageable. Now with the supply chain issues where a lot of materials are up way beyond the normal expectation of overruns, I can’t blame ownership at all for wanting to back out for a year or so until things stabilize. And let’s face it, the climate change costs or whatever they’re titling it seem like a bit of a farce so if ownership wants to use that as an excuse, that’s fine. But it really seems like costs have gone up dramatically where unless you have an owner who has a ton of disposable income, it’s totally reasonable that ownership would back out, albeit temporarily.
|