[Bring_Back_Shantz]

Originally Posted by monkeyman

Look at her reaction to Chu. Refused to swear him in, appealed to the Alberta government to remove him.
Her urgent motion to debate legislation in Quebec and asking council to pledge $100,000.
Her declaration of a state of climate emergency.
She did these things, publicly, apparently before consulting with those who would know if she has a case.
The Alberta government had to inform her removing Chu was not in their authority.
Donating to to oppose legislation in Quebec seems ill-conceived.
Declaring a state of climate emergency without consulting the very businesses she relies on(Oil and Gas).
These all seem very knee jerk and emotional.

Woman does things man doesn’t agree with.
Man says woman is emotional and knee jerk.

Has man given any consideration to her reasoning or the timeframe over which she made those decisions?
Nope.