Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk
The City has a climate resiliency strategy, part of which includes ways in which buildings can reduce their environmental footprint. A lot of those measures are not mandatory, including rooftop solar. Here’s what happened here, since the rooftop is a large surface we asked if they could include rooftop solar. They said they could, but not as a condition of approval, could do if it was a condition of occupancy. This would allow the time to seek a potential partner. We said, ok, that’s reasonable. If they had said no, there is nothing in policy that could enable to us to force them, and we wouldn’t.
|
That’s good to know. And typically how these green initiatives play out.
I don’t know the specifics of $3m or $4m for climate items are but that certainly can’t be all solar related. So what is the mayor referring to then?