Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame
At this point, I'm on the City's side. They have been more than generous in providing funds, assets, and overrun costs from the taxpayer dime (over $300M). CSEC already moved to change the deal in July, and the City agreed to share cost overruns. If any issues with infrastructure come along in a complex project like this - not to mention the larger master plan considerations, then it's the City that has to bring it up and be blamed as the "bad guy" as I'm sure is CSEC is going to position them - once again. Effectively they want the city to cover more and more of the project - more creeping costs for the taxpayer.
The Flames are awesome, but Murray Edwards and CSEC can go pound sand.
|
If this was the Flames changing the deal by 1 cent, and admitting as much like the mayor is, you'd be having a heart episode.
Plain and simple, this mayor is ignoring a contract signed in good faith from the councillors and mayor and ultimately citizens of the city, from a very cautious previous mayor, who's seat is still warm.