View Single Post
Old 12-10-2021, 10:00 AM   #371
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by surferguy View Post
I don’t understand why people keep speaking about getting to the trailhead. I’d wager 90% of the tourists that go to Banff never make it to a trailhead. They go to Banff and check out the town for a day or two. The train gets them from the airport to Banff relatively easy.

Having been to mountain towns in Europe, I’d never consider a car when arriving because the train takes me where I want to go.

Maybe the framing is different for me, I don’t see this as something that is needed for locals (it would be sweet as an option) but needed for tourists. Am I wrong for seeing it that way?
Not wrong at all. I actually think that the biggest benefits to Calgarians would be economic. Calgary is bypassed by so many, and that's a missed opportunity for the city. Calgary is basically Banff's airport, but capturing a few of them for a day or two would be great. An easy link with good frequency between YYC, downtown, and Banff would be a much easier sell to travel companies, tour operators, and individual tourists. When they book the YYC-Banff ticket, have a little option for a day or two in Calgary with an associated hotel deal, and then continue on your way. Easy peasy.

A train to the the airport would also benefit locals somewhat. I actually don't think that LRT on its own should be a priority (way more benefit for LRT to be prioritized in other areas first), but a commuter train as part of the Banff project makes more sense.

On top of all of that, if I can hop on with the tourists and go to Banff without a car for a few days, or even as a day trip - bonus. If I want to drive instead? That's fine too. It is just about options.
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jimmy Stang For This Useful Post: