Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
It absolutely does not fit, even if you ignore the triviality of the harm in comparison. There are plenty of circumstances where a negative review of a business is perfectly warranted and acceptable. There are other circumstances where it is debatable - as we see in this thread - whether a bad review was warranted or not in the circumstances. There are no circumstances whatsoever where there is a reasonable debate about whether someone deserved to be raped.
|
You're bringing rape into this; not me.
The term fits when you tell a company to 'do a better job' when they get an undeserved bad review. The company is a victim and they're being blamed for the poor review. That's victim blaming.