Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
No.
They are not saying the parents are responsible because he is a 'child', but that the parents are responsible because their actions or inaction helped lead to the tragedy.
Are they wrong?
|
As a matter of law, we will find out.
I disagree that the prosecution (or those in this thread) is not making this about him being their child. If the shooter was an adult, then it would be difficult to make the argument that they had a legal right to force him into counselling or any of the other interventions.