Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyIlliterate
I’m saying that Kingsbury had a middling record at Tech as a head coach. He wasn’t particularly impressive in conference or overall play, so why would OU want him? He had (apparently) a talent at getting good players, but he wasn’t able to do much with them, and he certainly didn’t smoke Oklahoma year in and year out.
If Kliff had won every game, won a few national titles, and so on, then, sure OU would look at him. But he didn’t.
|
Riley came from Tech and had far less experience.
Who are you suggesting they will look at if criteria is a few national titles? I don't think Nick is going to be interested.