Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
The action was identical. The first example should be catch a break because the offender was less successful in his attempt to injure.
|
What if he was trying to make was taking a swing with intent to crack his skull, but only grazing him vs intending to just graze him and accidentally cracking his skull.
Which one is worse, attempt to injure without an injury or no attempt to injure with an accidental injury? I mean, in terms of the action, I'd say the first swing is worse than the second -- but in terms of the result, the second is clearly worse than the first.
Which one should be punished more, or should they both be treated equally?