Quote:
Originally Posted by Maritime Q-Scout
Another take from Devin, this time about the judge in the Rittenhouse trial.
I look forward to BoLevi's analysis on how biased Legal Eagle's hot takes about this judge:
|
This one seemed much better.
Although, I think he could have been harder on the judge over the handling of the two big constitutional issues (the video evidence and the 5th amendment violation). The judge could have immediately declared a mistrial with prejudice on either of those two right on the spot. Instead, he wanted to wait for what the jury came back with before ruling on those.
It's quite probable that he would have declared a mistrial with prejudice if Kyle had been found guilty. Watching people lose their minds over that would have been entertaining. In the end, they came to the right result.