Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
Lol, did you read my post? Of course what you bolded were assumptions, it was clearly representative of how vague the text quoted was. It can only lead to assumptions. There's nothing there to "confirm" anything, and portraying it as confirmation of something is silly. For the record, I have yet to say it means anything in particular. Which I don't think it does. It is neither confirmation, nor is it evidence for, the made up narrative that some posters had over the circumstances of the Sutter hiring.
|
The argument from many (not necessarily you) was that the owners reached in and hired the guy last March over Treliving's head.
If they were in conversation for over a year I would imagine Treliving was involved given;
a) he just came off a 1st place conference finish
b) they haven't fired him in two off seasons since
Not a lot of assumptions there in my mind.
And did you read my post? I even stated an owner could have reached out, but that's not circumventing your lame duck GM.