[BoLevi]

Originally Posted by PepsiFree

"From the trial." Hate to break it to you, but this all happened before the trial, in the dark, and in some cases of the actions: within split seconds.

We know from the video that Huber had turned away from Rittenhouse when he was shot. We know from the angle Grosskreutz was at, that's what he saw. We know Rittenhouse had his gun pointed at Grosskreutz within the same second Grosskreutz had his gun pointed at Rittenhouse, and if you want to make the argument that Rittenhouse assessed the situation (saw Grosskreutz point his gun, raised his rifle, and then fired) within that second, you're free to, but good luck. What we don't know is if Grosskreutz would have fired, especially if Rittenhouse hadn't pointed his gun at him. We know this we can't know this, because he had multiple chances to fire on Rittenhouse before that, and he didn't.

It is straightforward, which is why it's weird you can't grasp it.

You're arguing the jury was wrong in acquitting KR?