View Single Post
Old 11-22-2021, 08:41 PM   #409
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggy Lidstrom View Post
And non sequitur? Check my previous posts dude. You’re cherry picking again.
You went straight from ‘Yes, I did say something in regards to fragility’ to ‘You don’t want to have productive discussion with me’. The latter statement in no way follows from the former, or from anything else that you said previously, and as such is a non sequitur.

I am prepared to have a productive discussion with you, but I am losing hope that such a thing is possible.

Quote:
It’s not ad hominem if I’m addressing an unspecific group. Google is right there bro.
This is from the Department of Philosophy at Texas State University:

Quote:
Ad Hominem

(Attacking the person): This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone's argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument. The fallacious attack can also be direct to membership in a group or institution.
By making blanket statements about the board, you are making a fallacious attack on all the members of CP. That is a straightforward ad hominem.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.

‘You see in Calgary, [Ryan] Huska is no joke. It’s good. He’s really set on a specific model defensively. If you can be reliable, you have the freedom to play offence.’
—Ethan Wyttenbach
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post: