Quote:
Originally Posted by BoLevi
You're wrong.
The jury determined: KR did nothing wrong because the other three made credible threats KR's wellbeing (or acted in a way that could cause grievous bodily harm).
The reality is that there were three perpetrators and one victim. As Marlo Stanfield said: You want it to be one way. But it's the other way.
|
The facts, nor any practical or legal definition of the term “victim,” support anything you have to say in this post, but it’s a free country and you’re welcome to make up whatever you want and call it reality.
I find it bizarre that with even more posts than I have in this thread, your obviously keen interested has not produced any fruits of understanding. Might be worth reading up what the jury actual determined and how crimes and trials work and their implications. Reading even some layman-level material should shore up your confusion.
Though I just as well suspect you probably do know and are doing your usual thing. But, if you do honestly lack info here, it’s worth educating yourself.