Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers
The Flames have made it clear they aren’t interested in trading for rentals. If you think it’s going to be a rental, and they trade for him, they have information that we don’t regarding an extension. It’s so exhausting to read as a rebuttal to everyone’s ideas. “But he will be a rental”, said so definitively. When Treliving has said that he isn’t moving assets for rentals.
|
Treliving has never been one to give up significant assets for a rental. Meaning, do not expect him to be trading a first round pick or controllable asset for Hertl or Forsberg, as an example.
On the other hand, he has given up midround picks for depth rentals. A 4th for Forbort as an example. People whine incessantly about this, but there is an ebb and flow to these transactions. The Flames receiving a 3rd for Rittich as example.