View Single Post
Old 11-20-2021, 11:21 AM   #560
BoLevi
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Innocent until proven guilty.

Self-defence is based on belief. It was enough that Rittenhouse truly believed these people were going to kill/maim him. A ruling of self-defence is not a guilty verdict of attempted murder on the other side. That’s not how the law works.
Self defence is based partly on belief, and partly on fact. It was not sufficient for him to simply believe that.

In a self defence case, the person who is the aggressor is not put on trial, but their actions certainly are.
BoLevi is offline   Reply With Quote