Quote:
Originally Posted by BoLevi
They tried to kill someone. That someone being Kyle Rittenhouse.
KR did nothing legally wrong from the start of the incident to the end.
The analogy in all of this is not a rape victim wearing a skirt.
The proper analogy is a potential rape victim using her posessions to kill an assaulter.
If you're in any way shape or form angry at this verdict, you're a victim blamer.
|
No, this is absolutely wrong.
Rittenhouse should not be compared to a rape victim. Rittenhouse as a victim SHOULD be blamed. He is morally responsible for these deaths. He was one of the main causes of these deaths.
By comparing him to a rape victim you imply that rape victims put themselves in situations to be raped. This is not true. Rapes occur generally with people known to the victim. A rape victim has no mora culpability in being raped. Rittenhouse took actions that led to these peoples death. Now the dead also took actions that were reasonably foreseeable to cause their deaths. Neither group should be compared to rape victims.
You are doing it for shock value and it’s disgusting.
There are two issues hear legal and moral responsibility. Do you believe that rittenhouse holds any moral responsibility for the deaths.