Quote:
Originally Posted by cam_wmh
Ok right originally, but left it is. It's where he plays on Bayern, to allow that late step inside, banger.. vs run to the flag and bang a cross, or step-over.
But the 3-4-3 formation, does not promote those centre backs to make those overlaps. You're asking them to provide a third of the defending, while advancing in attack. It's not feasible, you're asking for 20+ km of running. I appreciate the want for Total Football, but if the other 9 outfield positions follow the 3-4-3, formation you're leaving your other two defenders grossly exposed on counters, and early dispossessions.
Alves and Carlos, would've never attacked from a 3 in the back back-line. Instead a flat 4, or 3 CBs with advanced 2 WB's (where they were widest). I'm honestly not sure if Madrid & Barcelona, even used 3 in the back back then. Usually, 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1
|
As someone who plays as the CB in a 3-4-3 fairly often, it is INTEGRAL that your LCB and RCB stay close. You can have the strong side guy venture a little more, as long as the weak side winger covers. I lose my mind when my defenders get lost, b/c then I'm facing a 2v1 down my throat.
Cam is right...a 3-4-3 is more conducive to the RCB and LCB supporting as opposed to overlapping/flying down the wings. With three in the back, they need to stay more central and keep opposition to the outside.