Quote:
Originally Posted by OptimalTates
|
No, it's supposition to build a case. This is the body of evidence they have to document to make their case. The problem is the testimony of the other officers blows a hole in this supposition, which is why it held no water. When you have one guy say something, and then are able to call the other six responders and ask them if they saw a knife, it completely discredits the one guy who said he saw the knife. And then when you trot out this digital image, all it takes is someone with minor skills in digital imaging to blow this out of the water as well. How was the image captured? How was it filtered? How was the sharpening done? What is there so little detail in the image? Why did the other officers NOT see this? The only time anyone could confirm the existence of the knife is from the floorboard of the interior of the SUV. A defense attorney with even the lowest level of experience would rip this to shreds. Supposition does not make a case.
Quote:
|
Fair enough. But when Blake, you know the dead guy who got shot and came back from the dead apparently, confirmed he had a knife, why is there an argument? You don't believe Jacob Blake when he tells you he has a knife? Why? If Blake said it was his cellphone, sure maybe we can make the case it wasn't conclusive but when he says it was a knife, I'll take his word for it lol.
|
No one is denying he had a knife. Blake admitted he had a knife... in the SUV. Blake has denied he had a knife during his altercation with officers, and has repeatedly stated he would not draw a knife on the police. So we have six cops who said no knife. Jacob Blake saying he had no knife on him during the wrestling match, but acknowledging he had one on the vehicle. But you got one cop (no backup) and a blurry innocuous screen shot from a video shot at a distance, and this is what you hang your hat on? Good thing you're not a cop or an attorney, because you'd be unemployed pretty quickly, as your supposition doesn't hold water.
Quote:
|
All the rest of blaming the Black woman as being a liar without any evidence other than her refusing to talk to investigators after her fiance was shot and she made international news. Let's see these "lies after lies" she said. Right now all she did was what most domestic violence victims do.
|
It's not blaming black women, even though you're doing your best to try and turn this into something it isn't. It's blaming someone who lied to the police multiple times. She lied about the stolen credit card and the $500 withdrawls. They were quickly tracked back to her. She lied about the sexual assault. Again, you are ignoring the fact that her live-in aunt refused to give testimony to support her claims.
Keep trying to dodge all of this testimony, but it is what makes cases. Without hard evidence you need to have eye witness support. Those did not exist. The six cops refused to testify to the existence of the knife. The aunt refused to testify to the assault. The witnesses completely destroyed the supposition of the case the DA tried to build. But continue to believe the house of cards that quickly came crashing down, and ignoring the witness testimony that burned that house of cards to ash. The results are damning and consistent with the facts presented.