The issue at hand is the trail of one individual. This specific case is not about inequalities or disparity between how races are treated by the law, and it can’t be framed as such. The situation and the actions of those involved are relevant. The entire social structure of america can not fairly be considered here.
Maybe I’m reading it wrong, but it sure sounds like some are looking at this case and it’s outcome through a lens of social inequality with some weird brand of retributive Justice.
Yeah, the entire situation is ####ed. From the 15th century to today, it’s no good man. But that absolutely is not at the feet of this guilt or innocence in the case. Everyone knows that, but it sure sounds like some don’t want it that way.
__________________
No, no…I’m not sloppy, or lazy. This is a sign of the boredom.
|