Quote:
Originally Posted by opendoor
What problem would that solve?
You need to understand, most people are reasonable and not ideological. You're coming at this from an ideological angle (if x is OK then why isn't y?). But most people don't think that way and look at things on a case-by-case basis. If a rule has obvious utility, people generally support it. So people are OK with requiring vaccination in certain situations during a pandemic, but they're not OK with tattooing things on peoples' foreheads (which has no public utility) or (somehow) forcing women to get vaccinated against a non-contagious disease before engaging in sexual activity. If you think these are equivalent scenarios, then that's your problem, because almost everyone else understands the clear differences.
|
Everyone else is working too hard with their equivalencies, examples and responses towards Kipper3434. That's exactly what these people thrive on, it's what they want because they can rapid fire their social media bubble "research" at the sheeple, hence the back and forth going for pages.
Opendoor came in and just nailed it. Perfect.