Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Liability is a derivative of the primary reason.
And the primary reason is that we need compliance, in order to make the roads safe. Driving would be a chaotic death match without rules and regulations. The only way it is functional for society, is if we all play by the same rules. And in order to ensure that, we restrict who can drive.
If you want to drive, you learn the rules, you get a license, you maintain your license and your understanding of the rules, and you COMPLY with the rules of the road.
If you do not do these things, you cannot drive a vehicle on the roads.
Because driving is a privilege that is earned. It is not a right.
|
Driving is a privilege. Existing and living a normal life are privileges too? Don't get into politics. Again you don't need photo I.d. to participate in life, except for in a few exceptions ( driving, going to a bar, boarding an international flight.) What kind of totalian monster equates participating with society as a privilege? You do realize driving for the purposes of work is protected as a right? The court works with people who have their license suspended do to intoxication as long as they need to drive for work.
The only similarity between drivers licenses and vaxports is the photo I.d. aspect. Everything else is a stretch.