Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
Yeah, I realise we don't have fusion and commercially it will be a while, but companies like TAE are suggesting that they could have something viable within a decade. When you have these kinds of things (along with ITER), it gives me some hope that the technology is going to come along. I don't think that this is a quick fix, and of course nothing is cheap. But if we're serious about net-zero, nuclear is a must in my opinion, and the cleanest and best nuclear is going to be fusion.
|
That decade is the "we'd like more funding" estimate, not the "this is how long it will reasonably take" estimate.