Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
Because it doesn’t include nuclear.
And thus doesn’t solve the problem.
While still costing $131 trillion specifically.
A nuclear plant costs between $4-5B from what I’ve read - that $131 trillion could build 26,200 nuclear plants at $5B/pop.
It’s going to build zero.
|
Which would give you about 26TW of energy, world wide energy use is about 160,000TWH obviously not all electricity so 131 trillion doesn’t seem out of step with the order of magnitude that needs to be spent.
https://ourworldindata.org/energy-pr...on-consumption
Am I missing something where governments committed to IERNAs vision for net 0 by 2050 because I don’t understand the backlash over the number.