Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Seriously, the more you read about the policies and stupidity coming out the big meeting, the more you realize it is all just a schtick to funnel money from the taxpayers to 'green organizations' without any actual practical approach to fixing the problem.
They are completely delusional.
|
That’s all it could possibly be when you say “$131 trillion dollars” with a straight face and don’t immediately bring your pinky finger up to your mouth.
It’s like, tell me you have no idea how to solve a problem without saying “we have no idea how to solve this problem.”
No worries, we’ll just spend $131 trillion on it over the next 30 years.
Why $131 trillion? You can’t do it for $120 trillion? Or an even $100 trillion?
Or are you budgeting $15 trillion for cost overruns?
Why not spend $150 trillion? Or $200 trillion?
#### it, the planet’s at stake - why don’t we spend $1 whatever comes after a trillion dollars in the next 15 years and nip this in the bud?
This is fixing to be the biggest grift in human history.
It would be comical if it wasn’t going to kill off tens of millions of the poorest people on the planet.
Whatever the effects of climate change, rest assured we in the first world will feel them far less.