Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon
I'm sure this has been discussed before, but "future considerations" just means nothing at all, right?
|
Not necessarily. There have been trades where an asset was later moved to fulfil the ‘future considerations’ part of the deal.
But ‘nothing at all’ is the way to bet it, certainly.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
‘You see in Calgary, [Ryan] Huska is no joke. It’s good. He’s really set on a specific model defensively. If you can be reliable, you have the freedom to play offence.’
—Ethan Wyttenbach
|